Re: [PATCH weston] simple-dmabuf-drm: use GBM generic calls

Hi everyone, On 11 July 2018 at 09:33, Daniel Stone wrote: > Hi, > On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 at 09:16, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:53:15 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort >> wrote: >> > No need to write libdrm driver specific code for each supported >> > driver, we can just let GBM

Re: [PATCH weston] simple-dmabuf-drm: use GBM generic calls

Hi, On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:53:15PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > No need to write libdrm driver specific code for each supported > driver, we can just let GBM call the right one for us now. > > Signed-off-by: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > --- > > Hi, > > This simplifies the code a lot,

Re: [PATCH weston] simple-dmabuf-drm: use GBM generic calls

Hi, On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 at 09:16, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:53:15 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > wrote: > > No need to write libdrm driver specific code for each supported > > driver, we can just let GBM call the right one for us now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Emilio Pozuelo

Re: [PATCH weston] simple-dmabuf-drm: use GBM generic calls

Adding more people to CC. On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:53:15 +0200 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > No need to write libdrm driver specific code for each supported > driver, we can just let GBM call the right one for us now. > > Signed-off-by: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort > --- > > Hi, > > This

[PATCH weston] simple-dmabuf-drm: use GBM generic calls

No need to write libdrm driver specific code for each supported driver, we can just let GBM call the right one for us now. Signed-off-by: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort --- Hi, This simplifies the code a lot, using gbm_bo as Emil suggested. Some problems I still see: - NV12 doesn't work, it seems