On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:41:57 +0200
Giulio Camuffo wrote:
> 2016-06-18 19:15 GMT+02:00 Armin Krezović :
> > Currently, weston assumes a surface/view is mapped if
> > it has an output assigned. In a zero outputs scenario,
> > this isn't really
2016-06-18 19:15 GMT+02:00 Armin Krezović :
> Currently, weston assumes a surface/view is mapped if
> it has an output assigned. In a zero outputs scenario,
> this isn't really desirable.
>
> This patch introduces a new flag to weston_surface and
> weston_view, which has
On Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:16:31 +0200
Armin Krezović wrote:
> On 21.06.2016 14:05, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:15:23 +0200
> > Armin Krezović wrote:
> >
> >> Currently, weston assumes a surface/view is mapped if
> >> it
On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:15:23 +0200
Armin Krezović wrote:
> Currently, weston assumes a surface/view is mapped if
> it has an output assigned. In a zero outputs scenario,
> this isn't really desirable.
>
> This patch introduces a new flag to weston_surface and
>
Currently, weston assumes a surface/view is mapped if
it has an output assigned. In a zero outputs scenario,
this isn't really desirable.
This patch introduces a new flag to weston_surface and
weston_view, which has to be set manually to indicate
that a surface/view is mapped.
Signed-off-by: