Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

2015-11-25 Thread Nils Chr. Brause
Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > On 24 November 2015 at 12:41, Nils Chr. Brause > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100 >>> "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Auke Booij

Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

2015-11-24 Thread Auke Booij
On 24 November 2015 at 12:41, Nils Chr. Brause wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100 >> "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Auke Booij wrote: >>> > On 9 November 2015 at 18:17, Bill Spitzak wrote: >>

Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

2015-11-24 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:41:03PM +0100, Nils Chr. Brause wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100 > > "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > >> > On 9 November 2015 at 18:17, Bill Sp

Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

2015-11-24 Thread Nils Chr. Brause
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100 > "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Auke Booij wrote: >> > On 9 November 2015 at 18:17, Bill Spitzak wrote: >> >> I really do not see the problem with allowing it to be an

Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

2015-11-18 Thread Bill Spitzak
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote: > > > We'll see how that patch is received. If anyone complains it breaks > > their thing, I think we have to revert it, because it is technically > > breaking the stability rules. > > The most obvious thing that would "break" is that every clie

Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

2015-11-17 Thread Jonas Ådahl
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:46:21PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100 > "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > > > On 9 November 2015 at 18:17, Bill Spitzak wrote: > > >> I really do not see the problem with allowing i

Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

2015-11-16 Thread Erik De Rijcke
Changing C int to C uint is ok for Java. Java only knows signed ints anyway, I therefore already map C uint to Java int, which is ok as long as no arithmetic is needed. On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100 > "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote: > > >

Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

2015-11-16 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100 "Nils Chr. Brause" wrote: > On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > > On 9 November 2015 at 18:17, Bill Spitzak wrote: > >> I really do not see the problem with allowing it to be an int argument as > >> long as the enum value 2^31 is not used. Tho