On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:47:30 +0200
Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:43:52 +
> "Singh, Satyeshwar" wrote:
>
> > Imagine a benchmark case where the client renders for example 800
> > frames and attaches their buffer ids to a surface, the compositor
> > uses the last one that cam
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:43:52 +
"Singh, Satyeshwar" wrote:
> Hey guys,
> As you know, Weston doesn't wait for client buffers to finish
> rendering. That is typically left as an exercise for the kernel mode
> graphics driver. I am wondering if anyone knows why this policy
> decision was made? M
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:28:11 +
"Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB)" wrote:
> Hello Satyeshwar,
>
> nice to hear from you again (:
>
> short answer to your question: there is already implementation which is doing
> what you are asking:
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/merge_requests/32
Hello Satyeshwar,
nice to hear from you again (:
short answer to your question: there is already implementation which is doing
what you are asking:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/merge_requests/32
Best regards
Emre Ucan
Engineering Software Base (ADITG/ESB)
Tel. +49 5121 49 693
