On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:34:24 +0100
Axel Davy wrote:
> Hi,
> > If you read the above paragraph carefully, you see that the last
> > sentence CHANGES EXISTING WAYLAND CORE PROTOCOL BEHAVIOUR.
> >
> > The change is very subtle. It means, that without a wl_surface.attach,
> > the buffer state is no l
Hi,
If you read the above paragraph carefully, you see that the last
sentence CHANGES EXISTING WAYLAND CORE PROTOCOL BEHAVIOUR.
The change is very subtle. It means, that without a wl_surface.attach,
the buffer state is no longer applied on commit at all! To recap, the
buffer state is:
- frame ca
Hi Jason,
thanks for the reply. I think I wrote more like a flamebait than a
solution there. After sleeping over it and discussing with Axel, I think
changing the existing core protocol behaviour is not appropriate, and
we need to find another way around this.
More below.
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:
On Feb 17, 2014 2:35 AM, "Pekka Paalanen" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> there is one important thing in the below spec I really need to
> highlight! See further below.
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:35:17 +0200
> Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > it's time for a take two on the Wayland presentation exte
