On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:14 AM, Pekka Paalanen
wrote:
>
> Arnaud's code:
>
> surf[BLUE] = surface_create(ctx, NULL, 100, 100, 0, 0, 0xffff);
> if (!surf[BLUE])
> die("failed to create root surface");
>
> surf[RED] = surface_create(ctx, surf[BLUE], 100
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:51:04 -0700
Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
>
> > The problem is that the way it works is *not* a tree, but some kind of
> > list.
> >
> > As described the following code:
> >
> > wl_subsurface_place_below(RED->subsurface, GREEN-
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> The problem is that the way it works is *not* a tree, but some kind of
> list.
>
> As described the following code:
>
> wl_subsurface_place_below(RED->subsurface, GREEN->surface);
> wl_subsurface_place_below(GREEN->subsurface, BLUE->surface);
The problem is that the way it works is *not* a tree, but some kind of list.
As described the following code:
wl_subsurface_place_below(RED->subsurface, GREEN->surface);
wl_subsurface_place_below(GREEN->subsurface, BLUE->surface);
Produces the order GREEN, RED, BLUE instead.
However if you desc
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:47:03 +0800
Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 04:46:55PM +0200, Arnaud Vrac wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering if a behaviour of weston related to subsurfaces is either a
> > bug or intended. The protocol description is not clear on what happens in
> > the fol
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:42:43 +0800
Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:02:52AM -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> > I was not aware you could stack subsurfaces under a parent surface at
> > all. Is this intended protocol behavior? The fact that you might be
> > able to do that at all i
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015 08:02:52 -0700
"Jasper St. Pierre" wrote:
> I was not aware you could stack subsurfaces under a parent surface at
> all. Is this intended protocol behavior? The fact that you might be
> able to do that at all in Weston might be a bug.
Yes, stacking behind the parent is intend
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 04:46:55PM +0200, Arnaud Vrac wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering if a behaviour of weston related to subsurfaces is either a
> > bug or intended. The protocol description is not clear on what happens in
> > the follow
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 04:46:55PM +0200, Arnaud Vrac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if a behaviour of weston related to subsurfaces is either a
> bug or intended. The protocol description is not clear on what happens in
> the following cases:
>
> Suppose I have a shell surface (BLUE) and two sub
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:02:52AM -0700, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> I was not aware you could stack subsurfaces under a parent surface at
> all. Is this intended protocol behavior? The fact that you might be
> able to do that at all in Weston might be a bug.
From wl_subsurface.place_above:
"... T
I was imagining that this was a fullscreen mode, given that you had no
UI stacked under the video.
The thing about surfaces is that you can configure them as you like
every frame. If you have a browser playing multiple videos, each video
can be a subsurface, and then when you transition to a fulls
It's possible, but the OSD is usually longer lived than the video surfaces,
which might be transient. For example in an HTML browser, a declarative UI,
etc, multiple video surfaces could be created for some pages and then
destroyed when the page is closed.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Jasper S
Why can't you use the video as the main surface and an OSD as a subsurface?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Arnaud Vrac wrote:
> I'm not sure, but I find it very useful for a video player. The video is
> stacked under the OSD and to be able to use hardware planes, the only viable
> option with
I'm not sure, but I find it very useful for a video player. The video is
stacked under the OSD and to be able to use hardware planes, the only
viable option with wayland is to have a surface for the OSD and a
subsurface for the video which is stacked under.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Jasper
I was not aware you could stack subsurfaces under a parent surface at
all. Is this intended protocol behavior? The fact that you might be
able to do that at all in Weston might be a bug.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Arnaud Vrac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if a behaviour of weston related t
Hi,
I'm wondering if a behaviour of weston related to subsurfaces is either a
bug or intended. The protocol description is not clear on what happens in
the following cases:
Suppose I have a shell surface (BLUE) and two subsurfaces (RED, GREEN). I
want to stack them to I get RED, GREEN, BLUE from
16 matches
Mail list logo
