This is one of the gripes I have with the computer industry in general: if they tell you things like this in advance you could plan for such eventualities. Instead the consumer does a bunch of time- and energy-consuming research, does the best he or she can and purchases a product. Later these sorts of glitches come up and vendors treat you like an idiot because you expect the product to actually *work*. The comment that most annoys me is "It only cost $100." In my frugal New England opinion the word "only" does not belong in the same phrase with "$100".
End of rant. You can now return to your regular programming. Sherry Stephen Caudill wrote: > AFAIK, modifications are kept track of within XP via a point system (this is >garnered from a recent article in a PC hardware magazine who's title escapes me). >i.e. a new hard drive would be one point (out of four available), a new motherboard >two. So, if you upgraded from a single CPU system to a dual processor (necessitating >a new motherboard) you would acrue your maximum of 4 points (one for each processor, >two for the board), at which point you would need to buy a new license. Thats just >plain bad business in my opinion. > ____ • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • ____ To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version: http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub ________________ http://www.wdvl.com _______________________ You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: archive@jab.org To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
