[wdvltalk] RE: Flash and corporate sites

2003-01-28 Thread Furry, Tim
Cheryl wrote: .was trying to determine from the code what the visitor would see if they didn't have flash Mark added: I simply said no to ActiveX Controls, and it thinks I don't have Flash. What you get is a page with two links to install Flash and nothing else: no Flash,

[wdvltalk] RE: Flash and corporate sites

2003-01-27 Thread Cheryl D. Wise
What a mess. Since I do have flash installed I was trying to determine from the code what the visitor would see if they didn't have flash installed. Frameset upon nested frameset and not a single noframes tag that I could find. I'm actually glad you posted this site because I'm having to fill in

[wdvltalk] RE: Flash and corporate sites

2003-01-27 Thread J.R. Pitts
] Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Flash and corporate sites What a mess. Since I do have flash installed I was trying to determine from the code what the visitor would see if they didn't have flash installed. Frameset upon nested frameset and not a single noframes tag that I could find. I'm actually glad

[wdvltalk] RE: Flash and corporate sites

2003-01-27 Thread sherry young
I have Flash installed but once again I simply couldn't bring myself to bother to wait long enough for the show to load. I'm simply not intereseted in corporate light shows. Um, except for the little sock show. I still find that rather endearing. Usually I'm on a site to gather information and am

[wdvltalk] RE: Flash and corporate sites

2003-01-27 Thread Mark Groen
On January 27, 2003 at 7:31, Cheryl D. Wise wrote: .was trying to determine from the code what the visitor would see if they didn't have flash I simply said no to ActiveX Controls, and it thinks I don't have Flash. What you get is a page with two links to install Flash and