[wdvltalk] Re: Omaha.com; No sign truck braked before hitting bridge

2003-05-30 Thread Furry, Tim
Jan wrote: What's weird is that when I clicked on the link, it opened a mini window and that picture had the watermark on it. Just for curiosity, I right clicked and saved the picture and there is no watermark on that one. Don't you think the saved picture should have the watermark on it too?

[wdvltalk] Re: Omaha.com; No sign truck braked before hitting bridge

2003-05-29 Thread Mary L Rusinko
Jan wrote: What's weird is that when I clicked on the link, it opened a mini window and that picture had the watermark on it. Just for curiosity, I right clicked and saved the picture and there is no watermark on that one. Don't you think the saved picture should have the watermark on it too?

[wdvltalk] Re: Omaha.com; No sign truck braked before hitting bridge

2003-05-29 Thread sherry young
Not to scare you all, but I know even less about image control than I do about other aspects of computing. With that in mind, I'm wondering: You can enlarge a wee pic for web use right enough, but if you want to use it for print it wouldn't be possible to maintain resolution, right? So the wee