mary,
a very handy online quick reference for css and other things is w3schools:
http://www.w3schools.com/default.asp
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.449 / Virus Database: 251 - Release Date: 27/01/03
Michael,
Thank you for the w3c link; I have gone through the html and css classes
there! I am also considering delving into some of the other offerings
there, but haven't had the time to brain cells to do so yet! But I still
continue to look at other sources for more clues in my search for writing
Michael,
Eavesdropping again. Thanks for this reference. It's new to me and looks good.
S.
michael ensor wrote:
oops, sorry mary
btw amongst the best reference books O'Reilly's are considered to be up
there, and apologies in advance if you already have come across this, but
the NY Public
: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:17 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Questions regarding CSS
: Michael,
: Eavesdropping again. Thanks for this reference. It's new to me and looks
good.
: S.
:
: michael ensor wrote:
:
: oops, sorry mary
:
: btw amongst the best reference books O'Reilly's are considered
: [wdvltalk] Re: Questions regarding CSS
oops, sorry mary
btw amongst the best reference books O'Reilly's are considered to be up
there, and apologies in advance if you already have come across this, but
the NY Public libraries style guide might be useful:
http://www.nypl.org/styleguide
Michael,
You said btw the best advice I ever had was to do the basic site in NN and then
add embellishments. This is exactly my (admittedly unfashionable) approach. I
figure if it'll play in the Peoria of NN, it'll play anywhere. Besides, I'm very
uncomfortable leaving out a large segment of my
Micheal wrote:
snip
btw the best advice I ever had was to do the basic site in NN and then add
embellishments.
/snip
Why NN and not Mozilla?
I tend to use Mozilla with allowances for IE width issues. The code
generally then validates with no more than minor issues. Although with
tswebeditor I
and cannot do regex's properly. lol ]
- Original Message -
From: sherry young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:50 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Questions regarding CSS
: Michael,
: You said btw the best advice I ever had was to do the basic site in NN
- Original Message -
From: Trusz, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 2:54 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Questions regarding CSS
:
:
: Micheal wrote:
: snip
: btw the best advice I ever had was to do the basic site in NN and then add
: embellishments
It helps me, Janet. I'm getting closer...
Thanks.
Sherry
Janet Russeau wrote:
No, you do not need to use HTML in the *.css file. You would only include
your style declarations in this file.
The different books that I have read and various online resources have
listed the following as
Mary,
I would add to this that it would not be safe (design wise) to use comic
fonts (jokerman? Excaliber Logotype etc ) since their dimensions are very
different to the traditional and proportional types that form the basic
type sets (which I think are fewer even than Janet lists).
: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Questions regarding CSS
Mary,
I would add to this that it would not be safe (design wise) to use comic
fonts (jokerman? Excaliber Logotype etc ) since their dimensions are
very
different to the traditional
12 matches
Mail list logo
