Re: [Web-SIG] Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-28 Thread Rene Dudfield
On 4/29/05, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the full set of WSGI-enabled servers I'd like to see (and in > some way encorporate into Paste, of course): > > * CGI gateway (done: not sure of canonical location) > * Simple threaded HTTP server (done: wsgiutils) > * mod_python (?) > *

Re: [Web-SIG] Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-28 Thread Jacob Smullyan
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 01:02:31PM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote: > For the forking server, I really have no idea. There's several out > there, but I don't know about all the features that are desirable or > implemented. Several of the servers don't speak HTTP. I can't make > any specific criticisms,

Re: [Web-SIG] Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-28 Thread Mark Rees
On 4/29/05, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's the full set of WSGI-enabled servers I'd like to see (and in > some way encorporate into Paste, of course): > > * CGI gateway (done: not sure of canonical location) > * Simple threaded HTTP server (done: wsgiutils) > * mod_python (?) Ther

[Web-SIG] Re: Just lost another one to Rails

2005-04-28 Thread Greg Wilson
> Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: Dear Greg, I've read your email. What's your solution? Best Regards, -jj Hi JJ. My solution is for Guido (or someone with equivalent authority) to appoint someone "Benevolent Dictator for the Web for One Year", with a mandate to put together something that has all t

Re: [Web-SIG] Re: Just lost another one to Rails

2005-04-28 Thread Ian Bicking
Martijn Faassen wrote: Ian Bicking wrote: [snip] FWIW, I strongly suggested to Adrian that he call his project a CMS, not a web framework. Sure, it is also a web framework, but who cares about another one of those? It's interesting because it's a CMS, and it fills a niche that isn't well fill

[Web-SIG] Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-28 Thread Ian Bicking
Here's the full set of WSGI-enabled servers I'd like to see (and in some way encorporate into Paste, of course): * CGI gateway (done: not sure of canonical location) * Simple threaded HTTP server (done: wsgiutils) * mod_python (?) * ISAPI (done: http://isapi-wsgi.python-hosting.com/) * Zope product

Re: [Web-SIG] Re: Just lost another one to Rails

2005-04-28 Thread Martijn Faassen
Greg Wilson wrote: > > Greg Wilson wrote: > Well, here we all are, two weeks later... > Ian Bicking: > [Subway on Paste] > [Quixote on Paste] > [Adrian Holovaty's stuff on Paste] There's an old Chinese proverb (well, I was told it's Chinese): "If a hundred sages each tell you something diff

Re: [Web-SIG] Re: Just lost another one to Rails

2005-04-28 Thread Martijn Faassen
Ian Bicking wrote: [snip] FWIW, I strongly suggested to Adrian that he call his project a CMS, not a web framework. Sure, it is also a web framework, but who cares about another one of those? It's interesting because it's a CMS, and it fills a niche that isn't well filled right now. Could yo

[Web-SIG] WSGI adapter for Quixote 2.0.

2005-04-28 Thread Titus Brown
Hi all, pursuant to my Quixote2 tutorial and a private request, I've updated my WSGI wrapper for Quixote to work for Quixote 2.0. It's been greatly simplified in the process. It's called QWIP2, and there's a not-very-updated Web page here: http://www.idyll.org/~t/www-tools/wsgi/ The so