[Web-SIG] and now for something completely different!

2005-08-12 Thread Shannon -jj Behrens
Hey guys, Maybe I'm just ignorant (highly probable), but I'm really having a hard time keeping up with the "configuration" emails, especially when each of you is using slightly different definitions and trying to reach slightly different goals. Please forgive me for coming out and stating this.

Re: [Web-SIG] and now for something completely different!

2005-08-12 Thread Robert Brewer
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: > ...I'd like to propose that we framework authors try to > start sharing our backend session code. Let's just > create a library like Apache::Session > . > As much as possible, I think we can make it framework >

Re: [Web-SIG] and now for something completely different!

2005-08-12 Thread Ian Bicking
Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: > Maybe I'm just ignorant (highly probable), but I'm really having a > hard time keeping up with the "configuration" emails, especially when > each of you is using slightly different definitions and trying to > reach slightly different goals. Please forgive me for coming

Re: [Web-SIG] and now for something completely different!

2005-08-12 Thread Shannon -jj Behrens
If we get CherryPy (awesome, Robert!), Quixote, and Paste onboard, I'll consider it a huge success. -jj On 8/12/05, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shannon -jj Behrens wrote: > > Maybe I'm just ignorant (highly probable), but I'm really having a > > hard time keeping up with the "configu

Re: [Web-SIG] and now for something completely different!

2005-08-12 Thread James Gardner
Ian Bicking wrote: >PythonWeb has a session >module, but I don't know what its insides look like: >http://www.pythonweb.org/projects/webmodules/doc/0.5.3/html_multipage/lib/session.html > I was going to suggest it might be worth looking at the PythonWeb web.session module as a basis. The versio

Re: [Web-SIG] and now for something completely different!

2005-08-12 Thread mso
Ian Bicking wrote: > Paste has one too, but it's Not Very Good ;) I started using the flup session, but I got lazy and never flipped the switch to make it the default. There's been some discussion about sessions in the last few months on the Quixote list as well. session2 is at http://quixote.id

Re: [Web-SIG] and now for something completely different!

2005-08-12 Thread Ksenia Marasanova
Op 12-aug-2005, om 23:08 heeft [EMAIL PROTECTED] het volgende geschreven: > If a Quixote application were installed in Paste and used a third- > party > session manager, the session object would have to: > - allow arbitary attributes. > - default .user to None. > - have a .set_user(user) me

Re: [Web-SIG] and now for something completely different!

2005-08-12 Thread Rene Dudfield
Ok, here's my super list of wanted session features. Multiple reader, single writer locking. Or MVCC would be nice :) Otherwise if you use it for multiple requests at once(as in with ajax apps) everything slows way down. Having in the api a way to say 'I am just opening this for reading' would