On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:24:59PM -0500, kai wrote:
| this is my first post on this list. I am working on a way to monitor the
| progress of reading a file upload from wsgi.input. I can currently
| monitor the overall transfer and when individual files of a multiple
| file upload are completed
Clark C. Evans wrote:
> I'm puzzled why CONTENT_TYPE/CONTENT_LENGTH is listed as an ``environ``
> CGI variable when it seems the corresponding corresponding
> HTTP_CONTENT_TYPE/HTTP_CONTENT_LENGTH would work. Is there a reason for
> this redundancy? Which one should I use? If they differ, which
kai wrote:
> Hi All,
> this is my first post on this list. I am working on a way to monitor the
> progress of reading a file upload from wsgi.input. I can currently
> monitor the overall transfer and when individual files of a multiple
> file upload are completed. The ultimate goal of this is t
Clark C. Evans wrote:
> I'm puzzled why CONTENT_TYPE/CONTENT_LENGTH is listed as an ``environ``
> CGI variable when it seems the corresponding corresponding
> HTTP_CONTENT_TYPE/HTTP_CONTENT_LENGTH would work. Is there a reason for
> this redundancy? Which one should I use? If they differ, which
I'm puzzled why CONTENT_TYPE/CONTENT_LENGTH is listed as an ``environ``
CGI variable when it seems the corresponding corresponding
HTTP_CONTENT_TYPE/HTTP_CONTENT_LENGTH would work. Is there a reason for
this redundancy? Which one should I use? If they differ, which one is
correct?
Kind Regards
