At 12:12 PM 2/1/2006 -0500, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Feb 1, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
spec is about (like what is template polymorphism exactly ?)
Specifying only a template's *name* in code, not its type. In
peak.web, if I refer to a resource or template named foo, the
system
At 11:43 AM 2/1/2006 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 08:55:22PM -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
| Indeed, I'd argue that it'd be better here to create a WSGI-based
| template interface, rather than a specialized template interface.
| That is, if the compiled template returned by
On Feb 1, 2006, at 12:59 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 1
So asking for foo can resolve to foo.gif or foo.jpeg in the
file system? If you have to say in the code which it is, that's
not what I mean.
you can write a resolver that searches the filesystem for foo.* and
does some type
One specific concern about the returning the published object for
publisher-based frameworks is that often the published object has
references to other objects that might not make sense in the context
of the thread handling the rendering of the template. For example,
if you're using a
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
My criteria is that it would be easy to implement Phillip's proposal
in terms of mine (and I could provide a sample implementation of that
if it would help), but it doesn't seem so easy to do the opposite.
Actually, I believe you've got that backwards. Many things
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 05:15:26PM -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
| The template doesn't get to control the status or headers if all it
| can do is return is a string.
WSGI the hammer! Must we necessarly have a nail here?
I think what's missing in this discussion is that templates are often
used
At 05:42 PM 2/1/2006 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote:
| The template doesn't get to control the status or headers if all it
| can do is return is a string.
WSGI the hammer! Must we necessarly have a nail here?
Who's we? Strings don't meet *my* use cases, or those of other template
system and
On 2/2/06, Phillip J. Eby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
C'mon guys, where's the shooting down of my ideas that y'all promised? ;)
Bang.
___
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
