On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:50:11 -0500, Clark C. Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| My gut feeling: Ignores many parts of the WSGI spec (sendfile, strict
| error checking), supports unnecessary stuff for stdlib, i.e. Continue
| support,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 08:39:03AM -0500, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
| On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:50:11 -0500, Clark C. Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
|
| | My gut feeling: Ignores many parts of the WSGI spec (sendfile, strict
| |
On 2/15/06, Jean-Paul Calderone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HTTPS is orthogonal. Besides, how would you support it in the stdlib? It's
currently not possible to write an SSL server in Python without a third-party
library. Maybe someone would be interested in rectifying /that/? :)
Yes, why
On 2/14/06, Clark C. Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| There are many different ways to judge production quality. If we're
| talking about correct, (standards-compliant, even) code, I wholly
| agree.
Fantastic. I just don't
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 10:26:41AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| On 2/14/06, Clark C. Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:49:00PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| | There are many different ways to judge production quality. If we're
| | talking about correct,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:27:01AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| If you're worried about featurebloat have you even looked at
| the 190 line headers.py? I rest my case.
|
| What case? It's totally reasonable code implementing a fairly complete
| mapping API. Smells similar to rfc822.py
Clark C. Evans wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:27:01AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| If you're worried about featurebloat have you even looked at
| the 190 line headers.py? I rest my case.
|
| What case? It's totally reasonable code implementing a fairly complete
| mapping API.
