On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 05:26:28PM -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Opinions?
I have an opinion about a related matter, namely, a convenience syntax
for generating nodes.
One thing I like a lot about stan is its general thrust towards having
a concise, usable, sexp-ish syntax for this task that perm
Ian Bicking wrote:
> While the library would ideally have some (optional) knowledge of HTML,
> it would be out of scope to have it be a general page-builder (like
> HTMLGen, and a bit like markup.sf.net). I'm more interested in just
> using it to build fragments.
Never used it, but I came across
Are there any opinions on the best HTML/XML generation libraries out there?
For example, HTMLGen being the original (but too eclectic). Stan is
often also sited (http://divmod.org/projects/nevow#stan). I have an
extension of ElementTree along these lines in FormEncode
(http://svn.formencode.o
