On 30/04/2006, at 10:50 AM, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>> At 07:48 PM 4/28/2006 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>>> One is not more complex than the other.
>>
>> The implementation has more moving parts, but I was talking about
>> conceptual complexity.
>>
>> The most common web servers
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 07:48 PM 4/28/2006 -0500, Ian Bicking wrote:
>> One is not more complex than the other.
>
> The implementation has more moving parts, but I was talking about
> conceptual complexity.
>
> The most common web servers do not match path prefixes, they have
> directories a
> Perhaps this could go in Demo/wsgiref/?
Perhaps both Ian's and Phillip's examples could go into Demo/wsgiref/?
Bill
___
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/op
> It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
> implementation.
It seems to me that canonical exemplars are part of what a "reference"
implementation should include. Otherwise it would be a "standard"
implementation, which is considerably different.
Bill
