Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: Handling POST forms in WSGI

Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 02:04 PM 10/21/2006, Ian Bicking wrote: >> I've added another spec to wsgi.org: >> http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/handling_post_forms >> >> This one is a little more intrusive than wsgi.url_vars, but it addresses >> an outstanding source of problems: contention over

Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: wsgi.url_vars

William Dode wrote: > I hope you or somes others wsgi guru will also make somes proposals for > session and cookies... Ben Bangert made a proposal some time ago about session IDs. Maybe he'd like to resurrect that? I thought it was a good proposal. -- Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http:/

Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: wsgi.url_vars

Christopher Lenz wrote: > Am 21.10.2006 um 19:49 schrieb Ian Bicking: >> If a dispatcher (like `routes `_ or >> `selector `_) pulls named >> information out of the portion of the request path it parses, it >> can put >> that info

Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: wsgi.url_vars

Am 21.10.2006 um 19:49 schrieb Ian Bicking: > If a dispatcher (like `routes `_ or > `selector `_) pulls named > information out of the portion of the request path it parses, it > can put > that information into a dictionary in ``

Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: Handling POST forms in WSGI

At 02:04 PM 10/21/2006, Ian Bicking wrote: >I've added another spec to wsgi.org: >http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications/handling_post_forms > >This one is a little more intrusive than wsgi.url_vars, but it addresses >an outstanding source of problems: contention over wsgi.input. -1 on this being mid

Re: [Web-SIG] Proposal: wsgi.url_vars

On 21-10-2006, Ian Bicking wrote: > I think there's room for some more standards building on WSGI (that > aren't actually extensions of the WSGI spec itself). > > I put a page up on the wsgi.org site for this: > http://wsgi.org/wsgi/Specifications > > And I'm introducing what I think is low-hangi