Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 02:17 PM 6/25/2007 -0700, Robert Brewer wrote:
> > Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > > At 01:51 PM 6/25/2007 -0700, Robert Brewer wrote:
> > > For example, if an error occurs, isn't that an indication that the
> > > component is broken? Masking the failure just makes it
> > > l
On Jun 26, 2007, at 5:07 PM, Robert Brewer wrote:
>> I think I'm mostly confused by the name "process bus" because it
>> seems like the primary use case for something like this is where all
>> of the applications share the same process space
>
> I don't see why it should be limited by that. The pri
Chris McDonough wrote:
> On Jun 26, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Robert Brewer wrote:
>
> > Chris McDonough wrote:
> >> There are also non-webbish processes like postgres, mysql,
> >> etc. that
> >> need to be treated as "part of the application".
> >>
> >> I handle this currently by running all of the proc
[Graham Dumpleton]
> First comment is about WSGI applications somehow themselves using
> SIGTERM etc as triggers for things they want to do. For Apache at
> least, allowing any part of a hosted Python application to register
> its own signal handlers is a big no no. This is because Apache itsel
On Jun 26, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Robert Brewer wrote:
> Chris McDonough wrote:
>> There are also non-webbish processes like postgres, mysql, etc. that
>> need to be treated as "part of the application".
>>
>> I handle this currently by running all of the processes related to a
>> specific project und
Chris McDonough wrote:
> There are also non-webbish processes like postgres, mysql, etc. that
> need to be treated as "part of the application".
>
> I handle this currently by running all of the processes related to a
> specific project under a process controller (which happens to be
> imple
I've just made releases for Paste (core/Script/Deploy). Quick summary:
Paste core:
* The paste.httpserver has neat new threadpool stuff to improve the
reliability of your threaded server. Kill threads, see wedged threads,
restart the process, and more. This has been in progress for some time
(
On Jun 26, 2007, at 1:04 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> In Apache changing the certificates would need a complete restart of
> everything. Because the child processes aren't privileged they would
> not be able to trigger the main server to do so. This actually gets to
> one of my reservations about
Graham, thanks for this and the previous post. I've had these issues in
mind while designing the current bus, but you raised them far more
eloquently than I could have.
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> The only way we may know is to start stepping through specific uses
> cases one at a time, not even wor
