On 21/08/07, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 09:29 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> > After dealing
> > with this email, found a message in my spam box from someone else
> > doing the same thing. This other persons name is Manlio Perillo. I
> > have pointed them to th
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 09:29 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> On 21/08/07, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 18:42 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> >
> > > Pardon me if any of this is already obvious, but from your
> > > description it sounds like one or more parties mig
On 8/20/07, Graham Dumpleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 21/08/07, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 18:42 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> >
> > > Pardon me if any of this is already obvious, but from your
> > > description it sounds like one or more parties might
Cliff Wells wrote:
>> In Apache
>> mod_wsgi, a new FASTCGI like daemon mode was specifically implemented
>> to try and come up with an improvement over the sometimes hard to
>> configure and get working FASTCGI implementations for Apache.
>
> Personally, I think FastCGI is too difficult on every s
On 21/08/07, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 18:42 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>
> > Pardon me if any of this is already obvious, but from your
> > description it sounds like one or more parties might not be aware of
> > these points.
>
> One of the parties (Igor, Ng
Cliff Wells wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's someone working on a mod_wsgi module for the Nginx HTTP
> server/proxy and Nginx's author was asking if there is a diagram
> somewhere outlining the WSGI protocol (I think perhaps he'd help if he
> understood WSGI). I google'd a bit but came up empty-handed.
>
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 08:33 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> On 21/08/07, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There's someone working on a mod_wsgi module for the Nginx HTTP
> > server/proxy and Nginx's author was asking if there is a diagram
> > somewhere outlining the WSGI prot
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 18:42 -0400, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Pardon me if any of this is already obvious, but from your
> description it sounds like one or more parties might not be aware of
> these points.
One of the parties (Igor, Nginx's author) is certainly not aware of
these points (hence hi
At 02:08 PM 8/20/2007 -0700, Cliff Wells wrote:
>Hi,
>
>There's someone working on a mod_wsgi module for the Nginx HTTP
>server/proxy and Nginx's author was asking if there is a diagram
>somewhere outlining the WSGI protocol (I think perhaps he'd help if he
>understood WSGI). I google'd a bit but
On 21/08/07, Cliff Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's someone working on a mod_wsgi module for the Nginx HTTP
> server/proxy and Nginx's author was asking if there is a diagram
> somewhere outlining the WSGI protocol (I think perhaps he'd help if he
> understood WSGI). I google'd a
Hi,
There's someone working on a mod_wsgi module for the Nginx HTTP
server/proxy and Nginx's author was asking if there is a diagram
somewhere outlining the WSGI protocol (I think perhaps he'd help if he
understood WSGI). I google'd a bit but came up empty-handed.
Anyone know of anything?
TIA,
11 matches
Mail list logo
