Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0

2007-10-07 Thread Ian Bicking
Manlio Perillo wrote: > Phillip J. Eby ha scritto: >> At 11:04 AM 10/6/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote: >>> As an example, the WSGI write callable cannot be implemented in a >>> conforming way in Nginx. >> ...unless you use a separate thread or process. >> > > I'm insisting about asynchronous sup

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0

2007-10-07 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 07/10/2007, Manlio Perillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham Dumpleton ha scritto: > > On 07/10/2007, Manlio Perillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Phillip J. Eby ha scritto: > >>> At 11:04 AM 10/6/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote: > As an example, the WSGI write callable cannot be imple

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0

2007-10-07 Thread Manlio Perillo
Phillip J. Eby ha scritto: > At 05:48 PM 10/6/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote: >> Phillip J. Eby ha scritto: >> > At 11:04 AM 10/6/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote: >> >> As an example, the WSGI write callable cannot be implemented in a >> >> conforming way in Nginx. >> > >> > ...unless you use a

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI 2.0

2007-10-07 Thread Manlio Perillo
Graham Dumpleton ha scritto: > On 07/10/2007, Manlio Perillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Phillip J. Eby ha scritto: >>> At 11:04 AM 10/6/2007 +0200, Manlio Perillo wrote: As an example, the WSGI write callable cannot be implemented in a conforming way in Nginx. >>> ...unless you use a s