[Web-SIG] Choosing one of two options for url* in the stdlib reorg

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Cannon
[BCC'ing stdlib-sig and web-sig so that both vote but that I don't have to clear a bunch of replies in the stdlib-sig mailing list from people not on both lists =) ] With PyCon approaching and having other stuff on my plate to deal with I want to try to reach a consensus on the whole

Re: [Web-SIG] [stdlib-sig] Choosing one of two options for url* in the stdlib reorg

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Raymond Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm inclined towards the fancy naming option. Ditching the most commonly used module in the standard library doesn't seem like progress to me. The thing that seems to bug people is choosing between urllib and

[Web-SIG] Cookie, cookielib; what to do?

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Cannon
When I brought this up last it was when I first began bombarding this list with stdlib reorganization questions, so there was some noise about the whole process and no clear resolution was reached. The problem is that both modules have a Cookie class, so they can be merged. Much like the url*