Re: [Web-SIG] [proposal] merging jsonrpc into xmlrpc

2008-04-08 Thread Robert Brewer
Ian Bicking wrote: > Alan Kennedy wrote: > > Perhaps some pythonista from Web-SIG is most appropriate to advise > > how JSON-RPC should move forward? After all, we're more accustomed to > > server-side stuff than those javascript folks ;-) > > Let it die? It is more complicated than necessary, wh

Re: [Web-SIG] [proposal] merging jsonrpc into xmlrpc

2008-04-08 Thread Alan Kennedy
[Alan] >> [2] Perhaps some pythonista from Web-SIG is most appropriate to advise >> how JSON-RPC should move forward? After all, we're more accustomed to >> server-side stuff than those javascript folks ;-) [Ian] > Let it die? It is more complicated than necessary, when instead you could > just

Re: [Web-SIG] [proposal] merging jsonrpc into xmlrpc

2008-04-08 Thread Ian Bicking
Alan Kennedy wrote: > [1] But it's a shame they didn't write it on WSGI: then their services > could have run on the Google compute cloud ;-) Indeed. After seeing a BaseHTTPServer JSON-RPC server go up on the Python Cookbook I wrote a WSGI server and made it into a tutorial: http://pythonpaste.

Re: [Web-SIG] [proposal] merging jsonrpc into xmlrpc

2008-04-08 Thread Alan Kennedy
[Ronny] >> since json-rpc and xml-rpc basically do the same >> and the only difference is the content-type (json is more concise), >> i propose to create a single xml/json-rpc module. [Graham] > The problem with the JSON-RPC 1.0 specification was that it wasn't > always as clear as could have

[Web-SIG] google appengine

2008-04-08 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
You probably read that google has released appengine: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfgO-LXGpTM but they have disabled video responses. So here is mine anyway. http://www.vimeo.com/875433 Massimo ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org