Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Robert Brewer
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 09:37 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > >> I am not sure we ended up with a final answer on all of this, but I > >> don't want to hold up mod_wsgi 3.0, which includes Python 3.0 support, > >> any longer. As such, am implementing things as per: > >> > >> http://www.wsgi.org/ws

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/4/17 Robert Brewer : > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 00:12 -0700, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> > So, from where I sit, we have: >> > >> >  1. Many header values which are ASCII. >> >  2. A few header values which are ISO-8859-1 plus RFC 2047. >> >  3. A few header values which are URI's (no specified en

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Sergey Schetinin
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 02:03, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > 2009/4/17 James Y Knight : >> On Apr 16, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >>> >>> I am not sure we ended up with a final answer on all of this, but I >>> don't want to hold up mod_wsgi 3.0, which includes Python 3.0 support, >>> any

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/4/17 James Y Knight : > On Apr 16, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> >> I am not sure we ended up with a final answer on all of this, but I >> don't want to hold up mod_wsgi 3.0, which includes Python 3.0 support, >> any longer. As such, am implementing things as per: >> >>  http://

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread James Y Knight
On Apr 16, 2009, at 3:12 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: I am not sure we ended up with a final answer on all of this, but I don't want to hold up mod_wsgi 3.0, which includes Python 3.0 support, any longer. As such, am implementing things as per: http://www.wsgi.org/wsgi/Amendments_1.0 with excep

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Robert Brewer
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 00:12 -0700, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > So, from where I sit, we have: > > > > 1. Many header values which are ASCII. > > 2. A few header values which are ISO-8859-1 plus RFC 2047. > > 3. A few header values which are URI's (no specified encoding) or > IRI's > > (UTF-8). >

Re: [Web-SIG] Python 3.0 and WSGI 1.0.

2009-04-16 Thread Graham Dumpleton
2009/4/4 Robert Brewer : > Alan Kennedy wrote: >> [Bill] >> > I think the controlling reference here is RFC 3875. >> >> I think the controlling references are RFC 2616, RFC 2396 and RFC > 3987. >> >> RFC 2616, the HTTP 1.1 spec, punts on the question of character >> encoding for the request URI. >>