--- On Sun, 6/21/09, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> In other words, bobo doesn't need to support that sort of
> mechanism
> directly as Apache/mod_wsgi makes it a reasonably trivial
> thing to do.
Nice!
Ideally the same mechanism should work for other WSGI
implementations, and the same mechanism
2009/6/22 Aaron Watters :
>
> [whoops: graham, I meant to 'reply all', sorry for repeat]
>
> --- On Sat, 6/20/09, Graham Dumpleton wrote
>> Personally I believe 'bobo' would be a good alternative for
>> the people
>> who currently get drawn to the simplicity of 'publisher'
>
> It's not clear to me
[whoops: graham, I meant to 'reply all', sorry for repeat]
--- On Sat, 6/20/09, Graham Dumpleton wrote
> Personally I believe 'bobo' would be a good alternative for
> the people
> who currently get drawn to the simplicity of 'publisher'
It's not clear to me whether bobo has
the "just drop a fil
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:42:32AM +0300, Sergey Schetinin wrote:
> But let's go back to bobo, I can see how URL paths derived from file
> and function names are nice and make sense, but I'm not as thrilled
> with declaring the app path in a decorator. When looking at it from
> the perspective of "
Typical. The first time I make the effort to reply to the list, I
reply to sender rather than to list. I'm a muppet.
Anyway, reply below
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jason Briggs
Date: 16 June 2009 20:04:46 BST
To: Etienne Robillard
Subject: Re: [Web-SIG] Announcing bobo
"Ad homin
