One of the nice things about mod_python is the req.write() function.
Although I realize it's somewhat of an abuse to the http protocol, it's
handy being able to periodically update the client browser with a status
message for a long-running job.
So handy in fact that I have a number of
http://pythonpaste.org/waitforit/
HTH.
- Gustavo.
Aaron said:
One of the nice things about mod_python is the req.write() function.
Although I realize it's somewhat of an abuse to the http protocol, it's
handy being able to periodically update the client browser with a status
message for
At 01:01 PM 6/28/2010 -0600, Aaron Fransen wrote:
One of the nice things about mod_python is the req.write() function.
Although I realize it's somewhat of an abuse to the http protocol,
it's handy being able to periodically update the client browser with
a status message for a long-running
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 3:11 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 01:01 PM 6/28/2010 -0600, Aaron Fransen wrote:
One of the nice things about mod_python is the req.write() function.
Although I realize it's somewhat of an abuse to the http protocol, it's
handy being able to
Hello,
Sorry for this slightly off-topic message, but I was thinking it'd be nice to
meet other people interested in WSGI at EuroPython.
I don't have anything specific in mind. Probably share some beers. I'm open to
suggestions.
I'll be in Birmingham on the 17th and 20th of July; Saturday and
At 03:43 PM 6/28/2010 -0600, Aaron Fransen wrote:
Using mod_wsgi on Apache doesn't seem to exhibit that behavior.
You may need WSGIOutputBuffering Off in your config; see:
http://code.google.com/p/modwsgi/wiki/ConfigurationDirectives#WSGIOutputBuffering
Another possibility is that you've got
On 29 June 2010 05:01, Aaron Fransen aaron.fran...@gmail.com wrote:
One of the nice things about mod_python is the req.write() function.
One thing I should warn you about req.write() in Apache is that for
streaming data as you seem to be using it, it will accumulate memory
against a request for