Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI for Python 3

2010-07-19 Thread Paul Davis
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > On 19 July 2010 03:19, P.J. Eby wrote: >> At 01:01 PM 7/18/2010 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >>> >>> This is on the basis that if people are going to have to rewrite their >>> code >>> a fair bit to handle bytes everywhere, >> >> What

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI for Python 3

2010-07-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 19 July 2010 03:19, P.J. Eby wrote: > At 01:01 PM 7/18/2010 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote: >> >> This is on the basis that if people are going to have to rewrite their >> code >> a fair bit to handle bytes everywhere, > > What you mean by "rewrite their code a fair bit", and who is it that you

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI for Python 3

2010-07-19 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Go back through my blog and read some of the posts there so you have some of the history. Recent discussions build on some of the stuff there and I don't think anyone has the time to keep explaining all this to every new person who comes along. Graham On Monday, July 19, 2010, Aaron Watters wrot

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI for Python 3

2010-07-19 Thread Aaron Watters
I'm still in denial regarding Python 3 generally speaking, but it looks like something important is going on here.  Could someone summarize the main points (intelligible to a Python 2 troglodyte)? thanks in advance,  -- Aaron Watters === % man less less is more. __