On 30 August 2010 13:07, P.J. Eby wrote:
> At 11:16 AM 8/30/2010 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>>
>> Although I almost begged that if we are going to discuss bytes,
>> compared to text/unicode, that agreement at least first be made about
>> the definition of the bytes leaning option, that request
At 11:16 AM 8/30/2010 +1000, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Although I almost begged that if we are going to discuss bytes,
compared to text/unicode, that agreement at least first be made about
the definition of the bytes leaning option, that request has pretty
well fallen on death ears.
Did you not s
On 30 August 2010 11:02, Ian Bicking wrote:
> Ugh... why are we back at bytes again?
Because no official decision, by way of a vote or even consensus, has
ever been made, the bytes option never goes away.
The problem with bytes, before one even tries to compare it to
text/unicode option, is that
Ugh... why are we back at bytes again? I don't know of any concrete
problems with using Latin1 (basically how mod_wsgi works). It would be nice
to try out some tricky cases -- cookie parsing, HTTP proxies,
output-modifying middleware, a few other cases. But I don't see a reason to
expect they wo
