Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

2010-10-24 Thread Armin Ronacher
Hi, On 10/23/10 7:43 PM, P.J. Eby wrote: I don't think it's an either-or case. PEP just means that there's a clear path to port WSGI 1 apps. If somebody wants to champion a WSGI 1.1, a 2.0, and whatever else, that's great! Oh, I was not denying that. The original post on reddit to which I

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

2010-10-24 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote: I have to admit that my interest in Python 3 is not very high and I am most likely not the most reliable person when it comes to

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

2010-10-24 Thread Georg Brandl
Am 24.10.2010 17:58, schrieb Chris McDonough: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote: I have to admit that my interest in Python 3 is not very high and I am most likely

Re: [Web-SIG] Is PEP 3333 the final solution for WSGI on Python 3?

2010-10-24 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote: Am 24.10.2010 17:58, schrieb Chris McDonough: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote: Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough: On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote: I have to