Re: [Web-SIG] more moderators for Web-SIG list?

Hi Bill, Bill Janssen wrote on 2014-09-15 20:56: > Anyone want to help moderate the Web-SIG list? Very low activity level. > I'd just like to get some more people who can manipulate the levers. Sure, why not... > Bill Sven ___ Web-SIG mailing list We

[Web-SIG] more moderators for Web-SIG list?

Anyone want to help moderate the Web-SIG list? Very low activity level. I'd just like to get some more people who can manipulate the levers. Bill ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: https

Re: [Web-SIG] Flurry of old posts appearing

Wow. May I suggest asking for some new moderators? I understand the need to moderate posts (to prevent spam) but this isn't exactly encouraging to new contributors to the community... On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Bill Janssen wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > Did some kind of moderato

[Web-SIG] no_authkit_users_in_environ

Hello, I'm trying to make cookie auth working with authkit but cannot find a healthy solution. So far here's the code which i'm trying to use for getting a users object into the environ: #!/usr/bin/env python from notmm.controllers.wsgi import WSGIController from notmm.controllers.auth import Lo

[Web-SIG] Flurry of old posts appearing

Today (Sept 15, 2014) I just received several posts on web-sig that were apparently first posted in May. An example is a post by mouad ben with subject "Connection close when response is ready". Did some kind of moderator queue just get unplugged? Or should I assume these were held up by GMail? -

Re: [Web-SIG] Nodejs cluster

>> If you crosslink the Flask app object and the WebSocket factory with >>each other you can shuffle data in both directions. >That's super cool. Thanks! >What I propose is officially Python endorsed cluster standard. Am I over >thinking this? Or the status quo is good enough for everyone else? H

[Web-SIG] Connection close when response is ready

Hi, I would like to also share another gist (beside the one from the thread "wsgi server handling absolute URI"), as food to our thoughts to any one that find this interesting, this time it's about the connection: close http header that should instruct server to close the connection from their sid

[Web-SIG] WSGI server handling absolute URI

Hello, My name is Mouad and this is my first time writing to this mailing list. I hope this is the right mailing list to let interested party to know about a "minor" bug that i found in some WSGI server that are out there, that doesn't support absolute URI in an raw http request i.e. GET http

[Web-SIG] REMOTE_ADDR and proxys

Hi All, The CGI spec says: Script authors should be aware that the REMOTE_ADDR and REMOTE_HOST meta-variables (see sections 4.1.8 and 4.1.9) may not identify the ultimate source of the request. They identify the client for the immediate request to the server; that client may be a proxy, gateway,

[Web-SIG] WSGI for HTTP/2.0 ?

So HTTP/2.0 (http://http2.github.io/http2-spec/index.html) is far advanced, and my puny google-fu cannot find any upstream work on making a) updating and or replacing WSGI to support HTTP/2's new capabilities or b) an HTTP/2 capable SimplerServer or similar reference server in the standard library