On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 11 March 2016 at 10:34, Andrew Godwin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I realise this may sound bikesheddy, but it would be really good to
> >> not call it ASGI. From your docs "
> >> Despite the name of the proposal, ASGI does not specify or desi
On 11 March 2016 at 10:34, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>>
>>
>> I realise this may sound bikesheddy, but it would be really good to
>> not call it ASGI. From your docs "
>> Despite the name of the proposal, ASGI does not specify or design to
>> any specific in-process async solution, such as asyncio, twi
>
>
>
> I realise this may sound bikesheddy, but it would be really good to
> not call it ASGI. From your docs "
> Despite the name of the proposal, ASGI does not specify or design to
> any specific in-process async solution, such as asyncio, twisted, or
> gevent. Instead, the receive_many function
On 10 March 2016 at 13:34, Andrew Godwin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As some of you may know, I've been working over the past few months to bring
> native WebSocket support to Django, via a project codenamed "Django
> Channels" - this is mostly the reason I've been involved in recent WSGI
> discussions.
On 11 March 2016 at 08:32, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Well, the protocol server would be the thing that's doing the joining if it
> sees multiple headers - you'd always see comma-joined headers from clients
> as an ASGI application, which I like as I like consistency.
For consistency, why not
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:57 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
> I think you're right, and I've just been stubbornly trying to use a dict as
>> it's slightly "nicer". I honestly considered making both sides dict and
>> cookies the separate thing as they're the only special
On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Andrew Godwin wrote:
I think you're right, and I've just been stubbornly trying to use a dict as
it's slightly "nicer". I honestly considered making both sides dict and
cookies the separate thing as they're the only special case, but I suspect
that multiple headers are one o
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Cory Benfield wrote:
>
> > On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:34, Andrew Godwin wrote:
> >
> > To that end, I did some work to make the underlying mechanism Django
> Channels uses into more of a standard, which I have codenamed ASGI; while
> initially I intended for it to be
Hey,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Andrew Godwin wrote:
> Helpful quick Q&A: http://channels.readthedocs.org/en/latest/inshort.html
>
I have looked over that and it's not very clear what goes where. [1] I'd be
inclined to understand that the process type "that handles HTTP and
WebSockets" wo
> On 10 Mar 2016, at 00:34, Andrew Godwin wrote:
>
> To that end, I did some work to make the underlying mechanism Django Channels
> uses into more of a standard, which I have codenamed ASGI; while initially I
> intended for it to be a Django documented API, as I've gone further with the
> pr
10 matches
Mail list logo
