and
> saying "just inject this into file X at line Y" -- not pretty.
> However, I have to admit, that if taken as an iterative improvement
> over file/function name it looks very reasonable.
Seems like this style of declaring routes may be more like what you
want:
http://bo
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 10:01:20AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> On Mar 12, 2007, at 1:26 AM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:22:58PM -0500, Chad Whitacre wrote:
> >> Jim,
> >>
> >> First, your comments re: paying attentio
g
compatibility/extending a distutils style installation.
--
Brian Sutherland
___
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
be flexible enough
> to meet your requirements?
>
>
>
>
> chad
> ___
> Web-SIG mailing list
> Web-SIG@python.org
> Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/jinty%40web.de
