On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Alice Bevan–McGregor
wrote:
> Other than mod_wsgi, are there any PEP -compliant (or near-compliant)
> components in the wild? Enough to bring a framework to life in Python 3?
> What I see is the chicken-and-egg problem endemic with Python 3: developers
> wait
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Alice Bevan–McGregor
wrote:
> All input is welcome; I do want to hear from both framework developers and
> users of frameworks.
OK, here's my input. I'm not comfortable speaking on behalf of the
entire Django core team, but I am consciously wearing my Django BDFL
h
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Although [PEP ] is still marked as draft, I personally think of it
> as accepted; [...]
What does it take to get PEP formally marked as accepted? Is
there anything I can do to push that process forward?
The lack of a WSGI answer
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
> No other developers of actual web frameworks has commented at all on
> PEP from what I can see.
I wrote a bunch about WSGI/Py3 on python-dev:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-September/103674.html
http://mail.python.
