Re: [Web-SIG] ngx.poll extension (was Re: Are you going to convert Pylons code into Python 3000?)

> No, you are wrong. > WSGI *allows* an implementation to develope extensions. > > I'm complaining that WSGI 2.0 will break support for truly-async web apps. Correct me if I'm wrong. WSGI is great on paper and almost great in daily use. One of this peculiarities in the "middleware extension pat

Re: [Web-SIG] Dealing with urllib, urllib2, and urlparse

> I submitted my contributor agreement a while ago, so it should be on file. > My goal has always been to bring forward httplib2 for inclusion in the > std lib, but I didn't want to do that until I got support for proxies, which > just recently went in, and then there's starting to work at Goog

Re: [Web-SIG] wsgiref for python 2.4?

On Feb 7, 2008 5:48 PM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > The subject line kindof says it all, but is there a wsgiref for python 2.4? Yes, it is. ___ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web