On 2008-03-02 21:11, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Well, look at the docs for urllib. There is a list of restrictions
> (e.g., does not support the use of proxies which require
> authentication). From what I can tell, those items on the list that
> are an actual restriction do not carry over to urlli
On 2008-03-01 21:13, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 4:34 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2008-03-01 05:06, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> > Seriously, I just don't want to support two different approaches to
>> > the same problem.
&
On 2008-03-01 05:06, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Seriously, I just don't want to support two different approaches to
> the same problem.
Then what makes you believe that the urllib2 approach is the
better one ?
Why not move urllib2 to PyPI and keep urllib ?
>> It's not really an argument for dropping
Brett Cannon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:52 AM, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008-02-29 20:20, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> So, I'd be +1 on the second approach, provided that those
>> two classes make the transition into url.request as
>> w
On 2008-02-29 20:20, Brett Cannon wrote:
>> So, I'd be +1 on the second approach, provided that those
>> two classes make the transition into url.request as
>> well. Otherwise, I'm +1 on the first approach and -1
>> on the second.
>>
>
> Just to make sure I got this straight, as long as the tw
On 2008-02-29 01:47, Brett Cannon wrote:
> [BCC'ing stdlib-sig and web-sig so that both vote but that I don't
> have to clear a bunch of replies in the stdlib-sig mailing list from
> people not on both lists =) ]
>
> With PyCon approaching and having other stuff on my plate to deal with
> I want t
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 12/19/05, M.-A. Lemburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ok. In that sense, I think "moving" is not really possible
>> with database connections or cursors: these always rely on
>> external resources and these may be relying on hav
James Y Knight wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2005, at 6:57 PM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>
>> Ian Bicking wrote:
>>
>>> James Y Knight wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm worried about database access. Most DBAPI adapters have
>>>> threadsafety level 2: "
Ian Bicking wrote:
> James Y Knight wrote:
>> I'm worried about database access. Most DBAPI adapters have
>> threadsafety level 2: "Threads may share the module and
>> connections.". So with those, at least, it should be fine to move a
>> connection between threads, since "share OK" implies "
