Re: [Web-SIG] Communicating authenticated user information

2006-01-24 Thread Michal Wallace
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Clark C. Evans wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:25:35PM -0500, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > | You simply can't use environ values to communicate *up* > | the WSGI stack, since at no level is it guaranteed you > | have the "same" dictionary. Response headers and

Re: [Web-SIG] Communicating authenticated user information

2006-01-24 Thread Michal Wallace
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Jim Fulton wrote: > Michal Wallace wrote: > > > Maybe I just don't understand why this is important. Can someone (Jim) > > explain why this > > is a requirement in the first place? > > We do our own authentication for lots of reasons, inc

Re: [Web-SIG] Communicating authenticated user information

2006-01-24 Thread Michal Wallace
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Jim Fulton wrote: > Phillip J. Eby wrote: > ... > > I'm pointing out that the use case under consideration isn't specific > > *enough* yet. Do people's log files support unicode? Do the > > authentication systems? This hasn't been made clear, and it should be. > > I agree

Re: [Web-SIG] cusom config files. was (PasteDeploy 0.1)

2005-08-24 Thread Michal Wallace
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 11:46 PM 8/23/2005 -0400, Michal Wallace wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > > > > I would say that there is definitely a real need for a > > > declarative Python object definition syntax that suppo

Re: [Web-SIG] cusom config files. was (PasteDeploy 0.1)

2005-08-23 Thread Michal Wallace
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Phillip J. Eby wrote: > I would say that there is definitely a real need for a declarative Python > object definition syntax that supports nesting and internal references, and > so if we can come up with something good, it can and should *become* a > standard for such purpo