Re: [Web-SIG] [RFC] urllib2 requests history + HEAD support

2009-12-21 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 06:24:38PM +, Henry Precheur wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:38:19PM +0530, Senthil Kumaran wrote: > > There was a feature request to add support for HEAD requests. > > It would be nice to have other methods too, like PUT & DELETE: > > h

[Web-SIG] [RFC] urllib2 requests history + HEAD support

2009-12-20 Thread Senthil Kumaran
cked by the clients. -- Senthil On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 05:59:48PM +0000, Senthil Kumaran wrote: > > Senthil Kumaran added the comment: > > Having a HEAD request for urllib2 might be a good idea. I shall use this > patch to add the functionality. > > But, having a history supp

Re: [Web-SIG] Announcing bobo

2009-06-16 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:51:48PM -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote: > Hey, don't you people know that you could use a more polite word > than "Hey" to salute people ? > > I'm just telling my own views. If you disagree then please say something > more meaningful than this. Who cares what you know.

Re: [Web-SIG] Announcing bobo

2009-06-16 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:15:29PM -0400, Etienne Robillard wrote: > I think that if this Jim guy has lots of experience then at least he > could not pretend that other people works are made by/for geniuses, > which is probably untrue anyway. Hey, I don't understand why are being so negative with

Re: [Web-SIG] Looking for an efficient Python script to download and save a .zip file programmatically

2009-01-15 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 05:16:54PM +, David Shi wrote: > > I am looking for an efficient Python script to download and save a .zip > file programmatically (from http or https call). > Does not import urllib zipfile = urllib.urlopen(url_to_zip_file_name).read() do that? -- Senthi

Re: [Web-SIG] Dealing with urllib, urllib2, and urlparse

2008-02-22 Thread Senthil Kumaran
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > which I am liking. But I figured I would ask if there is any remote > chance the this SIG has plans to either merge urllib and urllib2 or > come up with a new module, or something before 3.0 comes out. > Otherwise MAL's