On Mar 3, 2007, at 11:27 PM, Chad Whitacre wrote:
...
Now, Jim: it looks like Zope still uses a Unix-y userland for
INSTANCE_HOME, yes?
Yes, but I hate it. At Zope Corporation, We're moving away from it
for a number of reasons.
For development, it adds structure that isn't needed. A Zope
On 3/5/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For production deployments, we (Zope Corporation) install files into
the *real* Unix tree where site administrators want them. We'll
typically have a deployment that includes a number of applications.
The deployment will create directories in
On Mar 5, 2007, at 9:16 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On 3/5/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For production deployments, we (Zope Corporation) install files into
the *real* Unix tree where site administrators want them. We'll
typically have a deployment that includes a number of
On 3/5/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/5/07, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We don't deploy to win32 and I don't know enough about win32 to
answer. I expect though that, like Unix, a production deployment is
going to look different than a development buildout. In any
Chad Whitacre wrote:
2. I'm not clear on how Paste Deploy's abstractions map to the
filesystem. What does my website root look like?
The way I have generally configured websites like this is like:
[composite:main]
use = egg:Paste#urlmap
/ = config:root.ini
2. I'm not clear on how Paste Deploy's abstractions map to the
filesystem. What does my website root look like?
The way I have generally configured websites like this is like:
[composite:main]
use = egg:Paste#urlmap
/ = config:root.ini
/blog =
