> It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
> implementation.
It seems to me that canonical exemplars are part of what a "reference"
implementation should include. Otherwise it would be a "standard"
implementation, which is considerably different.
Bill
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> At 01:19 PM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
>> It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
>> implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more
>> something that the infrastructure (Apache server or whatever) ought to
On 4/28/06, Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it's small enough, I'd say to add this mapper to wsgiref.util, or if
> Guido is strongly set against it being in the code, we should at least put
> it in the documentation as an example of how to use 'shift_path_info()' in
> wsgiref.util.
At 01:19 PM 4/28/2006 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
>implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more
>something that the infrastructure (Apache server or whatever) ought to
>take care of.
I'm fine with a s
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
> implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more
> something that the infrastructure (Apache server or whatever) ought to
> take care of.
I don't understand the distinction between
It still looks like an application of WSGI, not part of a reference
implementation. Multiple apps looks like an advanced topic to me; more
something that the infrastructure (Apache server or whatever) ought to
take care of.
I don't expect you to agree with me. But I don't expect you to be able
to
Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> I think another useful addition would be some prefix-based dispatcher,
>> similar to paste.urlmap (but probably a bit simpler):
>> http://svn.pythonpaste.org/Paste/trunk/paste/urlmap.py
>
>
> IMO this is getting into framework design. Perhaps something like this
> could
On 4/28/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to include paste.lint with that as well (as wsgiref.lint or
> whatever). Since the last discussion I enumerated in the docstring all
> the checks it does. There's still some outstanding issues, mostly where
> I'm not sure if it is too
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> PEP 333 specifies WSGI, the Python Web Server Gateway Interface v1.0;
> it's written by Phillip Eby who put a lot of effort in it to make it
> acceptable to very diverse web frameworks. The PEP has been well
> received by web framework makers and users.
>
> As a supplemen
PEP 333 specifies WSGI, the Python Web Server Gateway Interface v1.0;
it's written by Phillip Eby who put a lot of effort in it to make it
acceptable to very diverse web frameworks. The PEP has been well
received by web framework makers and users.
As a supplement to the PEP, Phillip has written a
10 matches
Mail list logo
