Re: [Web-SIG] Choosing one of two options for url* in the stdlib reorg

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Cannon
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Robert Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Cannon wrote: > > With PyCon approaching and having other stuff on my plate to deal with > > I want to try to reach a consensus on the whole > > urllib/urllib2/urlparse situation for the stdlib reorg in Python 3.0

Re: [Web-SIG] Choosing one of two options for url* in the stdlib reorg

2008-02-28 Thread Robert Brewer
Brett Cannon wrote: > With PyCon approaching and having other stuff on my plate to deal with > I want to try to reach a consensus on the whole > urllib/urllib2/urlparse situation for the stdlib reorg in Python 3.0 > and get it settled. > > So, two options for people to show support for. One is to

[Web-SIG] Choosing one of two options for url* in the stdlib reorg

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Cannon
[BCC'ing stdlib-sig and web-sig so that both vote but that I don't have to clear a bunch of replies in the stdlib-sig mailing list from people not on both lists =) ] With PyCon approaching and having other stuff on my plate to deal with I want to try to reach a consensus on the whole urllib/urllib