Hi,
On 10/23/10 7:43 PM, P.J. Eby wrote:
I don't think it's an either-or case. PEP just means that there's a
clear path to port WSGI 1 apps. If somebody wants to champion a WSGI
1.1, a 2.0, and whatever else, that's great!
Oh, I was not denying that. The original post on reddit to which I
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough:
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote:
I have to admit that my interest in Python 3 is not very high and I am
most likely not the most reliable person when it comes to
Am 24.10.2010 17:58, schrieb Chris McDonough:
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough:
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote:
I have to admit that my interest in Python 3 is not very high and I am
most likely
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
Am 24.10.2010 17:58, schrieb Chris McDonough:
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 17:16 +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 24.10.2010 16:40, schrieb Chris McDonough:
On Sun, 2010-10-24 at 10:17 +0300, Armin Ronacher wrote:
I have to
Hi,
On 10/22/10 2:35 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
has said:
Hopefully not. WSGI could do better and there is a proposal for
that (444).
Just to give this some more context: I think WSGI (even in Python 2) is
faulty and we have the possibility now to fix it. Nobody in the web
community is
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:43 PM, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
I don't think it's an either-or case. PEP just means that there's a
clear path to port WSGI 1 apps. If somebody wants to champion a WSGI 1.1, a
2.0, and whatever else, that's great!
I agree, I think PEP is
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Graham Dumpleton
graham.dumple...@gmail.com wrote:
No other developers of actual web frameworks has commented at all on
PEP from what I can see.
I wrote a bunch about WSGI/Py3 on python-dev:
For what it's worth, I'm happy with the changes made to WSGI 1 that
produced PEP .
I'm unlikely to champion PEP 444 going forward. It has already served
its primary duty to me personally (which was to catalyze the
formalization of some specification that is Python 3 inclusive).
However,
I did a solution based on the old PEP and works very well to me, i don't
know if could be used by others if any are interested i can send it.
El , Graham Dumpleton graham.dumple...@gmail.com escribió:
Any one care to comment on my blog post?
At 10:35 AM 10/22/2010 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Any one care to comment on my blog post?
http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/10/is-pep--final-solution-for-wsgi-on.html
As far as web framework developers commenting, Armin at:
On 22 October 2010 11:16, P.J. Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
At 10:35 AM 10/22/2010 +1100, Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Any one care to comment on my blog post?
http://blog.dscpl.com.au/2010/10/is-pep--final-solution-for-wsgi-on.html
As far as web framework developers commenting, Armin
11 matches
Mail list logo
