On 19 March 2014 22:02, Tobias Oberstein wrote:
> We are working on a system (on top of Autobahn) which provides builtin
> scale-up (multi-core) and scale-out (multi-node) capabilities:
>
> https://github.com/crossbario/crossbar
>
> This is work in progress and relies on WAMPv2. Here are a couple
>> If you crosslink the Flask app object and the WebSocket factory with
>>each other you can shuffle data in both directions.
>That's super cool. Thanks!
>What I propose is officially Python endorsed cluster standard. Am I over
>thinking this? Or the status quo is good enough for everyone else?
H
> sharing structures and data between nodes comes first
Must agree with this. How many people out there use Redis as de facto
semaphores and event synchronizing mechanism? (Think of Resque and all its
glorious spin-offs)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
>
> >> nodejs c
>> nodejs cluster looks no more than a simple master + workers
> model
>
> Yes, NodeJS cluster is simple, But IMHO it's the gravity which unifies the
> Nodejs ecosystem. While in Python world we only have WSGI and everyone
> else
> has its own cluster model. (Please correct me if I am wrong!)
Com
> nodejs cluster looks no more than a simple master + workers
model
Yes, NodeJS cluster is simple, But IMHO it's the gravity which unifies the
Nodejs ecosystem. While in Python world we only have WSGI and everyone else
has its own cluster model. (Please correct me if I am wrong!)
btw uWSGI is awe
Chris Withers writes:
>
> On 18/03/2014 12:37, exarkun@... wrote:
> >> Twisted Web is cool, but there's it's not as interchangeable as WSGI.
> >
> > Twisted Web includes a WSGI container. You can run any WSGI application
> > in it.
>
> How easy is it to get messages from a twisted-run websocke
> Yes, I am aware of Tornado and Twisted Web has WSGI container
> capabilities.
> The only missing piece is the cluster capability which is that the thread
> is about. :D
>
Honestly to me nodejs cluster looks no more than a simple master + workers
model (already used by gunicorn, uWSGI and many
Yes, I am aware of Tornado and Twisted Web has WSGI container capabilities.
The only missing piece is the cluster capability which is that the thread
is about. :D
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:37 PM, wrote:
> From: est
>>
>>
>> Thank you guys for all the info.
>>
>> Twisted Web is cool, but th
On 18/03/2014 12:37, exar...@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
Twisted Web is cool, but there's it's not as interchangeable as WSGI.
Twisted Web includes a WSGI container. You can run any WSGI application
in it.
How easy is it to get messages from a twisted-run websocket (say
autobahn) into and from
From: est
Thank you guys for all the info.
Twisted Web is cool, but there's it's not as interchangeable as WSGI.
Twisted Web includes a WSGI container. You can run any WSGI application
in it.
Jean-Paul
___
Web-SIG mailing list
Web-SIG@python.org
> is that client is limited to send operations only and requests to HTTP(S)
protocol only. Is that true? All other parts of the system can communicate
with whatever protocols they like.
Yes! Every incoming requests are HTTP.
There also need to be a long running process to hold all the fd pools fo
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:16 AM, est wrote:
>
> IPython.parallel
>
>
> http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/stable/install/install.html#dependencies-for-ipython-parallel-parallel-computing
>
> It's based on ZeroMQ(PyZMQ), and the `ssh` command. I don't think that's
> lightweigh enough for busy web clus
Thank you guys for all the info.
Twisted Web is cool, but there's it's not as interchangeable as WSGI. You
can use whatever framework django/flask/webpy/bottle you like and plug it
in as long as it's PEP-333 compatible. Not so much for Twisted and
Tornado's own ioloop engine.
IPython.parallel
ht
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:53 AM, est wrote:
> The best we've got is something like Celery, or Telegraphy for Django
Does IPython suits pattern better?
http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/stable/parallel/parallel_intro.html
> What do you guys think?
I think not to reinvent the bicycle. Use PythonJS +
From: est
Recently I've been playing with Nodejs and websockets, looks like their
community has advanced far ahead of us. For example
http://nodejs.org/api/cluster.html
The best we've got is something like Celery, or Telegraphy for Django,
We
The example I gave for Twisted Web on
https://s
Recently I've been playing with Nodejs and websockets, looks like their
community has advanced far ahead of us. For example
http://nodejs.org/api/cluster.html
The best we've got is something like Celery, or Telegraphy for Django, We
have multiprocessing module but it's often recommended to use
ze
16 matches
Mail list logo
