[Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-10 Thread Ian Bicking
I brainstormed some ideas for wsgiorg specs and added them to the spec page, and also copied here. I offer them here to see if there's particular specifications that seem interesting, and might be worth pursuing sooner than other ones. * Ben Bangert suggested a simple session standard, f

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-10 Thread Ben Bangert
On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Ian Bicking wrote: > * Ben Bangert suggested a simple session standard, focused solely > on the session ID (persistence handled elsewhere). This is fairly > modest > but still useful. I'll have to find that and take a look as I no longer recall what I was ta

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-10 Thread Luke Arno
On 11/10/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I brainstormed some ideas for wsgiorg specs and added them to the spec > page, and also copied here. I offer them here to see if there's > particular specifications that seem interesting, and might be worth > pursuing sooner than other ones. W

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-10 Thread Ian Bicking
Ben Bangert wrote: > On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:40 AM, Ian Bicking wrote: > >> * Ben Bangert suggested a simple session standard, focused solely >> on the session ID (persistence handled elsewhere). This is fairly >> modest >> but still useful. > > I'll have to find that and take a look as I n

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-10 Thread Ian Bicking
Luke Arno wrote: > On 11/10/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I brainstormed some ideas for wsgiorg specs and added them to the spec >> page, and also copied here. I offer them here to see if there's >> particular specifications that seem interesting, and might be worth >> pursuing soo

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-10 Thread Luke Arno
On 11/10/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luke Arno wrote: > > On 11/10/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I brainstormed some ideas for wsgiorg specs and added them to the spec > >> page, and also copied here. I offer them here to see if there's > >> particular specificat

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-10 Thread Ian Bicking
Luke Arno wrote: >> >> * Debugging mode is something that can be used in all sorts of >> >> places; to increase verbosity, annotate output pages, displaying >> errors >> >> in the browser, etc. Having a single key for turning on debugging mode >> >> would allow its consumption in lots of plac

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-11 Thread Luke Arno
Sorry, I've been out planting scuppernongs all day. On 11/10/06, Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Luke Arno wrote: > >> >> * Debugging mode is something that can be used in all sorts of > >> >> places; to increase verbosity, annotate output pages, displaying > >> errors > >> >> in the

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-12 Thread Robert Brewer
Title: RE: [Web-SIG] Possible specs Ian Bicking wrote: > I brainstormed some ideas for wsgiorg specs and added them to the spec > page, and also copied here.  I offer them here to see if there's > particular specifications that seem interesting, and might be worth > pur

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-12 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 07:45 PM 11/12/2006 -0800, Robert Brewer wrote: >Sessions have 1) been around forever, 2) have consistently been done >similarly for each implementation, and 3) already require interoperation >with third party code (database APIs), so introducing a common interface >would not introduce any ov

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-13 Thread Ian Bicking
Robert Brewer wrote: > Ian Bicking wrote: > > I brainstormed some ideas for wsgiorg specs and added them to the spec > > page, and also copied here. I offer them here to see if there's > > particular specifications that seem interesting, and might be worth > > pursuing sooner than other ones.

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-13 Thread Ian Bicking
Luke Arno wrote: >> >> >> * Some systems prefer that unexpected exceptions bubble up, >> like >> >> >> test frameworks. A key could define this case (modelled on >> >> >> paste.throw_errors) and thus disable exception catchers. >> >> > >> >> > -1 I don't need it. Too abstract. >> >> > >> >> >

Re: [Web-SIG] Possible specs

2006-11-13 Thread Joe Gregorio
On 11/10/06, Luke Arno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am worried that things are getting a little inventive > here. This is how things get heavy. Lets try to stick > to codifying those things that have a clear common > right way. +1 Wsgiorg.routing_args came about from several independent WSGI mi