Re: [Web-SIG] Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-29 Thread Shannon -jj Behrens
The reloading problem is a tough one, and Aquarium went through a lot of iterations before it came to a good solution. Now days, I have a property which tells what types of modules I'm interested in reloading. Then, if any module is stale, I reload all of those modules. This takes care of cases

Re: [Web-SIG] Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-29 Thread Ian Bicking
James Y Knight wrote: On Apr 28, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Ian Bicking wrote: What I want in a WSGI server twisted.web2 supports: HTTP, HTTPS, CGI, and I wrote SCGI yesterday and will commit it this weekend. FastCGI looks like a complicated protocol, so it'll probably be a bit harder than SCGI to

Re: [Web-SIG] Preferred set of WSGI servers

2005-04-29 Thread Steven Armstrong
On 04/29/05 03:38, Mark Rees wrote: On 4/29/05, Ian Bicking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's the full set of WSGI-enabled servers I'd like to see (and in some way encorporate into Paste, of course): * CGI gateway (done: not sure of canonical location) * Simple threaded HTTP server (done: