On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:33:41 +, David Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Everyone else may disagree but it seems to me that servers are where the
> remaining big gap is for wsgi.
>
> What I want is to be able to pester hosting services to provide a really
> good, fast, reliable wsgi
David Warnock wrote:
Everyone else may disagree but it seems to me that servers are where the
remaining big gap is for wsgi.
Oh, I'd probably agree, there's a lot of things on the server end of
WSGI which are unanswered. I guess this list that I wrote a while ago
covers some of the things like
Hi,
Everyone else may disagree but it seems to me that servers are where the
remaining big gap is for wsgi.
What I want is to be able to pester hosting services to provide a really
good, fast, reliable wsgi standards compliant server. I don't care if
the application deployment is non standard,
