Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI middleware library

2005-02-04 Thread Ian Bicking
Titus Brown wrote: -> What do people think about collaborating on a kind of "standard" library -> of WSGI middleware? Hi, Ian, ok, here's another response ;). I slept on it a bit, and I would like to suggest one modification: make it a cookbook of examples, rather than a library. This implies tha

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI middleware library

2005-02-04 Thread Titus Brown
-> What do people think about collaborating on a kind of "standard" library -> of WSGI middleware? Hi, Ian, ok, here's another response ;). I slept on it a bit, and I would like to suggest one modification: make it a cookbook of examples, rather than a library. This implies that we don't need

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI middleware library

2005-02-01 Thread James Gardner
Ian Bicking wrote: What do people think about collaborating on a kind of "standard" library of WSGI middleware? (Not standard like distributed-with-Python, just well publicized.) This is what I've tried to put together a little with WSGIKit, though not all parts of it would apply. And other

[Web-SIG] WSGI middleware library

2005-01-31 Thread Ian Bicking
What do people think about collaborating on a kind of "standard" library of WSGI middleware? (Not standard like distributed-with-Python, just well publicized.) This is what I've tried to put together a little with WSGIKit, though not all parts of it would apply. And other people are, I think