Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI mod_python wrapper

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Brewer
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote: > On Wed, 18 May 2005, Robert Brewer wrote: > > > I wasn't sure either. The mod_python docs say > > set_content_length() sets the header for you. > > I just happened to be reading this passingly - I don't know > what the code in question looks like, but IIRC,

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI mod_python wrapper

2005-05-18 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Robert Brewer wrote: > I wasn't sure either. The mod_python docs say set_content_length() sets > the header for you. I just happened to be reading this passingly - I don't know what the code in question looks like, but IIRC, by setting content-length you disable chunked en

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI mod_python wrapper

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Brewer
Phillip J. Eby wrote: > At 09:40 AM 5/18/2005 -0700, Robert Brewer wrote: > > After much poring through many specs, I've got a WSGI wrapper for > > mod_python that I'm fairly comfortable with. I'm sure PJE > > will find 16 holes in it right away ;) > > Nope; not a one that I can see. Although I'

Re: [Web-SIG] WSGI mod_python wrapper

2005-05-18 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 09:40 AM 5/18/2005 -0700, Robert Brewer wrote: >After much poring through many specs, I've got a WSGI wrapper for >mod_python that I'm fairly comfortable with. I'm sure PJE will find 16 >holes in it right away ;) Nope; not a one that I can see. Although I'm curious about your choice in send_h

[Web-SIG] WSGI mod_python wrapper

2005-05-18 Thread Robert Brewer
After much poring through many specs, I've got a WSGI wrapper for mod_python that I'm fairly comfortable with. I'm sure PJE will find 16 holes in it right away ;) but it fixes some of the problems in the rough draft I posted here last October. http://www.amorhq.net/blogs/index.php/fumanchu/2005/05