Bill Janssen wrote:
>> I think WSGI is a better interface than any of these. BaseHTTPServer is
>> a reasonable basis for building a server (wsgiref.simple_server and
>> other's use it), but the subclasses are a little funky IMHO. Giving
>> them the name http.server makes them seem like the Rig
> I think WSGI is a better interface than any of these. BaseHTTPServer is
> a reasonable basis for building a server (wsgiref.simple_server and
> other's use it), but the subclasses are a little funky IMHO. Giving
> them the name http.server makes them seem like the Right Solution, and I
> do
Bill Janssen wrote:
> Over on the stdlib-sig, Brett's proposing that we move some of the
> HTTP-related classes:
>
>> OK, to keep this ball rolling, here is my suggestion for reorganizing
>> HTTP modules:
>>
>> httplib -> http.tools
>> BaseHTTPServer -> http.server
>> SimpleHTTPServer -> htt
Over on the stdlib-sig, Brett's proposing that we move some of the
HTTP-related classes:
> OK, to keep this ball rolling, here is my suggestion for reorganizing
> HTTP modules:
>
> httplib -> http.tools
> BaseHTTPServer -> http.server
> SimpleHTTPServer -> http.server
> CGIHTTPServer -> ht
