If my clients care enough about selecting one JS framework over another, I'll do a cost-benefit analysis with them. To justify the one we like based on it's popularity rather than it's merits is the same logic that got many politicians in office that should not have been.
Let us select the best, not because someone else says so, but because it fits the task at hand. mdipierro wrote: > You are right. I did not say it was better because they use it. I am > saying if you talk to a client and they say "what's jquery, why not > XYZ?", if we do not have a better answer we and say "if it good enough > for the white house, should be ok for you". ;-) > > Massimo > > On Jan 22, 7:48 am, Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> wrote: > >> <flame> >> Oh, because Obama's team is the authority on web development too? >> Seriously! >> >> For that matter, they're using Microsoft to serve the page. By the same >> logic, it must be better! I think I'll switch...oh wait, can't afford >> it and I don't like lock in. >> >> Massimo, you should know better than to pick one solution to solve all >> the worlds problems. >> </flame> >> >> (I rarely resort to flames but this really chapped me.) >> >> mdipierro wrote: >> >>> In case somebody ever questions our choice of jquery >>> >>> http://keenekoncept.com/2009/01/22/whitehousegov-enters-21st-century/ >>> >> -- >> Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> >> Computer Guy >> Statewide General Insurance Agency (www.swgen.com) >> > > > -- Timothy Farrell <tfarr...@swgen.com> Computer Guy Statewide General Insurance Agency (www.swgen.com) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
