On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:57 PM, mdipierro <mdipie...@cs.depaul.edu> wrote: > I know it is ugly but 1) it works; 2) it very powerful when compared > with routes on rails and urls in Django; 3) is is backward compatible. > > Does not anybody remember that I never wanted to add this to web2py? > Now you know why.
Why you do not recommend using routes.py, like in: http://www.web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/42 ? I think this is very useful, including for create nice and more readable URLs (I don't like a "/default/" or some long URLs created by default). Does routes.py decreases web2py performance in an way that its use is discouraged? -- Álvaro Justen Peta5 - Telecomunicações e Software Livre 21 3021-6001 / 9898-0141 http://www.peta5.com.br/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to web2py@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to web2py+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
